The Army Corps of Engineers plan to increase the release of water from an up-river reservoir in South Dakota will more than likely cause flooding in the area, Platte County officials warned today. And not surprisingly, the oft-flooded downtown area of Parkville is once again in danger of being submerged.
Captain Mark Owen, Platte County Sheriff’s Office Emergency Management, has been notified by the National Weather Service and the Army Corps of Engineers that portions of Platte County are likely to experience flooding by the Missouri River in the near future. The Corps of Engineers plans to increase the release of water from the Gavin’s Points Reservoir in South Dakota beginning now until at least mid July.
The increased flow from the reservoir, coupled with normal expected rainfall, is expected to cause the Missouri River to reach flood stages and top levees in the northern part of Platte County. Residences and business in the Bean Lake and Iatan area may very well experience flooding. Residents in those areas are encouraged to make alternate housing arrangements in the event flood waters reach their homes.
The increased water flow may also cause levees to be topped in the central and southern part of the County. Residents and businesses in the Farley and Waldron areas should remain alert to developing conditions and make emergency plans for flooding if circumstances warrant. The potential affect of Missouri River flooding on Parkville and Riverside, as well as potential flooding by the Platte River, is still under evaluation by the Corps of Engineers and Platte County Emergency Management.
Platte County is working with the Corps of Engineers, SEMA and the various levee districts to determine what sand bagging options will be available in the affected areas.
Nowadays, the James Bond movie franchise resembles little the Bond of the '60s...the ones based on the Ian Fleming novels that were touted by President Kennedy in an Esquire magazine interview.
Can you imagine the reviews "Goldfinger" would receive today? Bond figures out the entire scheme while sipping Mint Juleps outside of Baltimore. (Right there that's a continuance problem since Baltimore is the home of The Preakness and their drink that nobody drinks is the "Black Eyed Susan".) The major conflict between hero and villain occurs over the brand of golf balls they're playing and a guy who throws a fedora at statues to make a point. Sure, it had Pussy Galore but those were the '60s, maaan. Today, even if you casted Khloe Cardashian in the role of Lois Lane, Superman would still get panned. Even if you casted Johnny Depp as Tonto...er...wait...never mind.
But then, for no apparent reason at all, Sean Connery teamed up with a studio and shot a counterfeit Bond movie in the early '80s entitled "Never Say Never Again". Connery, as most reading this (according to Google you are more than likely over 36, have a college education, own a home and have an ip address), was the original actor portraying Bond on the silver screen. Most (according to most) consider him to be the best of all the subsequent actors to portray him in what has become the longest serial in movie history.
The movie kinda sucked in that Connery seemed a bit conflicted at the time. He was in that awkward age range where he was still kind of clinging to the hope he'd be seen as virile enough to be a Bond but wizened enough to portray a Bond that was past his prime BUT still able to score a smoking hot 20-something Kim Bassinger.
But, to be fair and balanced, as so many news organizations are wont to do, he also rode a rocket-cycle, had a Trav-L-Bar stocked with Russian vodka, fois fras and caviar, and a Molt Blanc that could kill you while he pretended to write a letter. He also played a high stakes video game that shocked the loser's hand and paid out $50k for a win.
Connery's Bond ultimately won the game out (natch) but he gave up the purse for just one flamenco dance with Bassinger's alarmingly alarming "Domino" character. Her boyfriend agrees to the terms and later attempts to sell her at a hastily arranged slave auction that was steeped in tradition.
History is soooo boring. Let's see if Downton Abbey is on instead.
Anyway, the movie -- discounting the fact that I apparently remember every last detail of it -- failed for several reasons.
First, there was the whole "how can you top your first act?" thing. It's not like you can just throw on some makeup and a toupee and compete with your legacy.
Ok...maybe that's not the best example.
Secondly, how can you have a Bond movie without the 007 theme song? Because this was a renegade film that was made due to some Hollywood back-lot shenanigans that typically end up with a dead horse in your bed or films like "Never Say Never Again" or, even more tragically, an "Earnest" movie.
And seriously, I don't even want to know what sort of sickening things Jim Varney subjected himself to in order to get the funding for those movies. It's one thing to suffer for your art form but another thing to make everyone else suffer because you suffered and handed in a finger painting at the end of the day. I mean, come on...there are limits.